System Identification: Uncovering the Secrets of Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control

Have you ever wondered how to effectively identify and understand the dynamics of a system using control and state measurements? In this article, we will dive into the fascinating world of system identification through the lens of dynamic mode decomposition with control.

System Identification: Uncovering the Secrets of Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control
System Identification: Uncovering the Secrets of Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control

An Introduction to Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control

Dynamic mode decomposition with control is a powerful technique for linear system identification. It was primarily developed by Josh Proctor, in collaboration with Nathan Kutz and myself, as explained in the 2016 Sai ads paper.

The basic idea behind this method is to utilize measurements of the system’s evolution over time, along with control inputs, to determine the best-fit linear dynamical system that aligns with the observed measurements. By leveraging regression techniques, we can solve for the A and B matrices that accurately describe the underlying dynamics of the system.

The Discrete-Time Setting

Typically, system identification using dynamic mode decomposition with control is framed within a discrete-time setting. While it is possible to work with continuous-time data, sequential measurements in time are more commonly available.

The method assumes that we have access to state measurements, denoted as X, at different time intervals (X at time 1, X at time 2, etc.). These measurements are then organized into a snapshot matrix, capturing the evolution of the system over time.

Additionally, we have access to a snapshot history of the control input, denoted as Epsilon. This matrix contains the measurements of the control input corresponding to each state measurement. Together, these matrices form the input to the dynamic mode decomposition with control.

Further reading:  The Magic of Fourier Transforms: Unveiling the Hidden Power of Signals

Solving for the Dynamic Matrices

To solve for the unknown matrices A and B, we can express the discrete-time dynamical system directly in terms of the data matrices. This allows us to construct a matrix equation:

X prime (the matrix of snapshots shifted one timestep into the future) equals A times X plus B times Epsilon.

By manipulating this equation, we can solve for A and B using data-driven regressions. The resulting A matrix represents the dynamics of the system, while the B matrix captures the effect of the control input. This creates a linear reduced-order model, providing valuable insights into the underlying behavior of the system.

Cases of Known and Unknown B

There are two interesting cases to consider in dynamic mode decomposition with control. In the first case, we know the B matrix but are unaware of the dynamics described by the A matrix. In this scenario, we can easily solve for A by subtracting B times Epsilon from X prime. The resulting equation resembles a modified X prime, which can be used in the standard dynamic mode decomposition procedure to find the leading eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A.

The second case is more challenging. Here, we have no knowledge of the B matrix, making the simultaneous identification of A and B necessary. To address this, Josh Proctor devised a clever approach. By stacking the relevant matrices and performing dynamic mode decomposition on the combined framework, we can solve for the concatenated matrix containing both A and B. This involves utilizing techniques like singular value decomposition and pseudo inversion to extract the individual A and B matrices.

Unveiling the Correct Dynamics

The beauty of dynamic mode decomposition with control lies in its ability to accurately capture the dynamics of controlled systems. Without considering the control input, using regular DMD on the data would yield incorrect dynamics. By accounting for the presence of control inputs, we can obtain the true A and B matrices, avoiding any ambiguity in the system’s behavior.

Further reading:  What is a Database?

To illustrate this concept, we will demonstrate a MATLAB demo that compares the outcomes of naive DMD and corrected DMD with control. Naive DMD disregards the control input, leading to inaccurate dynamics. In contrast, corrected DMD with control correctly accounts for the control input, resulting in the accurate identification of the A and B matrices.

Unleashing the Power of System Identification

Dynamic mode decomposition with control offers a powerful tool for system identification. By leveraging this method, we can effectively uncover the governing dynamics of a system, understand its sensitivities, and even utilize the identified models for model predictive control. Whether you are delving into research or seeking practical applications, this technique opens up a new realm of possibilities.

So, why not delve into the world of dynamic mode decomposition with control and unlock the secrets hidden beneath the surface of your systems? For more exciting insights and information on information technology, don’t forget to visit Techal.

YouTube video
System Identification: Uncovering the Secrets of Dynamic Mode Decomposition with Control